Monkeys determine fate of the United States. Banana subsidies get instantaneous approval.
Some monkeys are…. what?
Even if the system could be hacked, he said, it could only be done by a person with “unfettered access to the system.” Bear noted that elections are not just the machines, but also the people who work the elections.
[Bear speaks on behalf of Diebold.]
OK, so I work the elections. The volunteers who work them with me meet the following criteria:
Not working during the day.
Willing to be paid $3.75/hour for a 16 hour day, no overtime.
Have no real accountability past the day of the election.
We get a lot of retirees. We get a few unemployed. We get a few like me who do it for their civic conscience (I don’t get called for jury duty, and feel this is my penance). We also get city/county employees, who get paid their regular salaries if they wish to man the polls on election day instead of their usual duties.
But we’re basically talking about people who don’t have any consequences for what happens that day, and don’t get paid enough to stay really honest.
It’s not that I don’t believe that election workers are honest. I do– I’m one of them, and I know we’re honest. BUT I also have the same belief about election workers as I do about TSA baggage handlers– these are not saints. You cannot put a temptation in front of them and expect all of them to ignore it. What’s more, a lot of election workers *are* politically aware and active, and may in fact have their own personal very strong beliefs about how the election should turn out.
I believe that I would not tamper with the election, given access, ability, and a sufficient lack of oversight to get away with it. But am I certain? Would anyone with a sufficient investment in the election results be completely temptation-free, confronted with that kind of opportunity?
I guess my point is: let’s not find out. Seriously; if your system relies on humans being 100% honest and infallible, then it’s inadequate to the task. Certainly, if your system can be hacked by a monkey (staged or otherwise), then it may be time to turn to a more simplified and verifiable process.